Talk:Ostwind

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ostwind article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

Why call it "Ostwind (tank)" instead of just "Ostwind"? I think this is the primary Ostwind english readers would look up.

I also removed the note of discrepency. Considering that it's only off by one, and therefore more accurate then pretty much every other figure we have, I don't think it's really all that relevant. Oberiko 22:35, 12 May 2004 (UTC)

I have no objections to just calling it "Ostwind"...and the difference of one tank is indeed small enogh to let it slip by :p Ferkelparade 13:34, 13 May 2004 (UTC)

I am under the impression that this imagecould be considered fair use; but I'm a n00b to edits and not really sure how to go about it all, especially with regards to images. It comes from this site which also has other old pictures of several WWII armor which may be of use. ~Springfinger 21:00 19 Sept 2006