Talk:Orchard Leigh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Buckinghamshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This page has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. (Add assessment comments) | |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance within the UK geography WikiProject. | |
Since when does me being the only contributor mean that this page gets deleted? It's a real place, see Streetmap. First I get told it's unreferenced when all I can go on is the fact that I live there, and now I'm being told that it's only worth deleting because I'm the only contributor. Are you interested in my contributions at all? -- Roleplayer 18:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hi! Please review Wikipedia:No original research and if you still have questions, contact me on my talk page. Cheers, Blastolite 18:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- According to the very first sentence of that policy that doesn't apply here, for the simple reason that this is a real place that really exists. I suggest you need to read the policies you're spouting out about to me. -- Roleplayer 19:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- While you are wrong about the policy not applying (it is considered original research), you have created a reference. Thanks for your help on Wikipedia. Cheers Blastolite 20:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- According to the very first sentence of that policy that doesn't apply here, for the simple reason that this is a real place that really exists. I suggest you need to read the policies you're spouting out about to me. -- Roleplayer 19:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Second nomination for speedy deletion on the same day
I really don't see what this user has against this article, seeing as it's an article, however short, about a real place, it says where that place is, and above on this same talk page is a link showing where that place is. Why is this page in particular being targeted over all others for annihilation? -- Roleplayer 19:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
