Talk:Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	LGBT Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.

	Literature Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Acronym

What does WC stand for in the context of "WC evangelical church" it isn't clear from reading it and I doubt it stands for water closet. Could someone point out what it stands for, or perhaps replace the acronym for what it actually stands for? I've read the book itself but I still can't think of what it might stand for. And now I think about it I don't recall it saying what kind of church it is, I think it is only assumed?

dacey 14:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] York Notes

Is it necessary to mention that there is a volume in the York Advanced Notes series by Kathryn Simpson in the very first paragraph? Sounds like a bit of a pitch to me. Mornington 19:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Nope, but it looks like the second paragraph to me? I think it's there to assert the novel's notability. The JPS^{talk to me} 21:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Are we then to await the availability of Advanced York Notes as a sign of notability? In my opinion this is a trivial piece of information, probably fit for a footnote. But I suppose this is the sort of information which is practical. Shame. Mornington 17:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

No, but it helps, doesn't it. A footnote is not the best place, but feel free to move it further down under an appropriate subheading (critical reaction, etc.). The article is in a primitive shape and needs references anyway. The positioning of a pretty uncontroversial paragraph should not be high on the priority list. The JPS^{talk to me} 20:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)