Talk:Open city

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

There was no article here, so i put down the little knowledge i have on this subject, feel free to add or change.

---

[edit] rules of war

alright then an open city can not be attacked as it is presumably just "march on". So if the attacker bomb the city in a "we're-just-checking" campaign before marching on, or march on running with flamethrowers burning the hell out of everything and screaming "we're the champions" it would BREAK the rules, but if the army just march on and guerrilla fighters from resistence movements attack them, are they breaking rules? sure yes, but then, who should take the blame, if the city is open and the invaded country has nothing to do with it anymore? the acts commited by the guerrilla are held on the state or are just marked as "impolite oh-jee-you're-beaking-the-rules"? if there is the confirmation of guerrila fighters infiltrated in the city the attackers can wash it way from the world without disrespect rules then? someone could explain that? it's kinda weird. i mean 'cause it's obvious you will not just walk in and be the nice guy if you know you will be shot dead by hidden bad dressed people. ps: guerrilla is a coward thing.