Talk:OpenOffice.org/Archive 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| ← Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 → |
Contents |
"OpenOffice" trademark holder
I wonder who has the OpenOffice trademark that forced this office suite to append the awkward and unlovely ".org" to its name. I think it would be relevant to mention the owner's name in the article and provide a link; I was curious about whom that might be and I'm sure other readers are, too. Does anyone know? LeoO3 02:02, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- I added a reference to the OpenOffice.org FAQ and removed the {{fact}} tag. (Someone else might want to beautify my edit; I wasn't sure how to reference a FAQ). I don't think this belongs in the article itself, but I found a "dead" trademark for "Open Office" using the search function at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. There are other possibilities: a trademark could be registered in another country, or someone could just be using it as a trademark -- there is no need to formally register one. I wasn't about to do an exhaustive search. EMan 23:46, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
External links
I removed a lot of external links... because, frankly, they were growing like weeds newsletters/blogs/fansites/book plugs. OOextras was already linked in the notes section and mentioned in the article body. - Motor (talk) 10:22, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Will there be a PIM-component comparable to MS Outlook ???
Just wondering if there are any plans known to integrate a PIM-component comparable to MS Outlook. Could not find anything about this in the Web, but found that the lack of such a component is the key point for criticism about OpenOffice. Would be very grateful in anyone could answer to this question and give further details on the issue 89.51.223.202 01:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)*
- Why duplicate what Mozilla are doing with Thunderbird? 210.10.199.9 08:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Font formats?
a word may be needed on font format support. Here I was expecting that this would be OS specific, independent of the word processor, but I'm sitting here with Microsoft Word 2004 and Neooffice on OS X 10.3.9, and while Word doesn't manage a single ligature, at all (!!), Neooffice is doing fine. Openoffice via X11, otoh, doesn't even see most fonts, I imagine it doesn't see the OpenType ones. Of course, if I cannot get OpenType fonts with Openoffice (X11), there can be no question of using it, and I'm stuck with Neooffice (which I suppose isn't so bad, but is there no way around this?) dab (ᛏ) 15:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- ok, I found out I need to use fondu [1] to use the .ttf part of the fonts. Concerning OpenType, google gives me mixed signals; does Openoffice, or does it not, support OpenType features in principle? dab (ᛏ) 15:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Archive
I've archived old conversations. Oberiko 16:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
How can i get the source of open office?
How can i get the source of Open Office???
- Follow the link to the OpenOffice.org homepage, then click "Get OpenOffice.org Version: 2.0.3." There is a link to the source there.
83.70.236.21 08:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
News update
The following information should be integrated into the article:
--70.111.244.69 00:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Draw comparable to CorelDRAW?
Shouldn't Draw be comparable to Visio instead of CorelDRAW? (Inkscape should be comparable to CorelDRAW)--218.103.186.83 00:29, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Cleanup needed
The paragraph starting with "Fedora Core" under Java Controversy needs cleanup. Specifically the part about the mailing list summary.heavensblade23 02:33, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Done. Did a bit of general cleanup as well; all those refs still need to be templatised though. Chris Cunningham 14:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
OpenOffice > MS word?
I've heard this from quite alot of people, is it true? --DerMeister (not logged in)
- OpenOffice's output should be redirected on top of the MS Word file? I don't quite get you. Chris Cunningham 20:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Is OOo greater than MS Office? I don't know. I'd say OOo is pretty much the same as MS Office, probably about MS Office 2000. Both are good pieces of software.
- The major difference is the price. MS Office is about £100 ($200), and much more if you want MS Access. OpenOffice.org is £0 (to download it). If you don't have a good internet connection, OOo (for Windows) is also on the Ubuntu Linux Live CD which you may be able to get sent to you by post, for free.
- My advice is try OOo - you don't have anything to lose. Then if you don't like it, buy MS Office. --h2g2bob 21:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

