Talk:Oneirocritica

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Greece      (Rated Start-Class) Greece Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Greece, an attempt to expand, improve and standardize the content and structure of articles related to Greece. If you would like to participate, you can improve Oneirocritica, or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (comments) Mid This article has been rated as a Mid priority article Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome. To participate, improve this article or visit the project page for more information. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. Mid This article is on a subject of Mid-importance within classical antiquity. WikiProject Books      (Rated Start-Class) Books Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

An entry from Oneirocritica appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 26 January 2007.

[edit] Combine with Artemidorus

It's artificial and against at least the conventions of a classical encylopedia to treat the author and his single surviving work and testimony to his life separately. In fact, the Artemidorus article is better and covers exactly the same ground. This article is worse. I've removed the worst parts--such as the constant misunderstanding of how ancient texts were and were not organized. And I took the "editions" section and replaced it with the editions section of Artemidorus, which actually lists editions, not a single English translation.

I suggest we delete this and combine with Artemidorus anything worth saving.

Lectiodifficilior (talk)

[edit] Context request

Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion.

What do modern science, medicine, psychology, etc. make of the theories espoused in this work? -- Beland (talk) 23:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)