Talk:On the Justice of Roosting Chickens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Books Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/On the Justice of Roosting Chickens. The consensus was to keep it. dbenbenn | talk 23:16, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)


violation of NPOV

Contents

[edit] POV

This is a rather rambling essay, not encyclopedic material.Zantastik 05:38, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] A new start

Now it's totally new. -- Toytoy 08:17, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

  • Since there was a copyvio notice, you should have created the new version in the /Temp subpage. I have re-added the VfD notice since there is still a vote going on, although I imagine that the votes against the old version will not be applied to the newer one (but again, this could have been avoided by using /Temp). -- Curps 19:54, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

OK, thanks for your noticing. -- Toytoy 04:36, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The scopes

If you agree, I plan to limit the "Consequences" section as brief as possible. The attacks against him is not only based on this book, they are based on Ward Churchil's political and moral ideas. Therefore, we may put details of his book on this page, and people's attacks of his ideas on his biography page. We may avoid unneed content overlapping.

By the way, I don't have the book. If any of you have a copy of that book, please write about other important topics. Thanks! -- Toytoy 06:21, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] "Scholar"

I wouldn't call Churchill a scholar but rather a polemicist. Эйрон Кинни (t) 01:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

This is a polemic, but he has done scholarly work, of varying quality. --Tothebarricades 21:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Consequences

Shouldn't the statement "In an extraordinary step, ..." be attributed? Who decides that this is an extraordinary step?

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:On the Justice of Roosting Chickens.jpg

Image:On the Justice of Roosting Chickens.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)