Talk:Omar Abdullah
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] IP 70.78.86.89
Pls do not keep adding point of views to the page. Pls discuss on the discussion page before adding non verifiable information. Lost 01:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
From the current editor:
- I fail to see how stating facts is vandalizing.
- It is a fact that:
- -Most people consider the election of Mr Abdullah as undemocratic.
- -It is a fact that he suffered a humiliting defeat in the assembly elections.
- -It is a fact that most senior party members defected from the NC after his nomination as peresident.
- -If I were vandalizing, I would delete most other facts such as his election to the Lok Sabha (Which I did not).
- -Please research the topic first, before considering my points as "nonsense".
- Have yourself a good one.
- All I am saying is that wikipedia needs sources to cite whatever you are citing. If you can cite sources for your additions, its ok. Else the comments will be reverted again. -- Lost 17:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
The general public using Wikipedia and wanting to research Mr Omar Abdullah would benefit from knowing his political standing in Kashmir.
- I wonder how it would benefit a Wikipedia user to know that Mr Omar Abdullah likes horseback riding? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.78.86.89 (talk • contribs)
-
- Yes, to improve the quality of the stub, such trivial info can be taken out. However, comments added by you, such as:
- Many see his take over of the NC party leadership as a non-democratic carry-over of an autocratic system
- His nomination as the new president of the NC party saw many resignations from senior party leaders
- As a sign of the discontent with the Abdullah Familie's monopoly on the party
- remains active, although shunned by the local populace
need citations from good sources, else they will be considered points of view. -- Lost 17:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Rewrite
I will shortly be rewriting the entire article as per MoS:BIO. Please feel free to add your valuable inputs. -- Lost 19:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

