Old Aramaic language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old Aramaic (up to 700 BCE)
Spoken in:	Ancient Near East
Language extinction:	up to 700 BCE
Language family:	Afro-Asiatic  Semitic   Central    Aramaic     Old Aramaic (up to 700 BCE)
Language codes
ISO 639-1:	none
ISO 639-2:	–
ISO 639-3:	oar
Note: This page may contain IPA phonetic symbols in Unicode.

The term “Old Aramaic” seems to be used by some writers to refer to the same phenomenon which is called “Ancient Aramaic” by others. This gives rise to considerable confusion. It will therefore be helpful to discuss the terminology of two leading figures in Aramaic scholarship, Joseph Fitzmyer and Klaus Beyer, who differ greatly in their analysis of the various periods of Aramaic and thus also in their usage of terms to describe those periods. We will begin with Joseph Fitzmer, because his articles are slightly earlier and his categories are also easier to understand and remember.

Fitzmyer proposes recognizing five phases in the development of Aramaic.^[1]

1. Old Aramaic - from ca. 925 to 700 B.C. (includes numerous small inscriptions + Sefire)

2. Official Aramaic - 700 to 200 B.C. (also “Imperial” or “Standard Aramaic”). Attested in several places in Egypt (including Elephantine), in Arabia and Palestine, as well as Syria, Assyria and Babylonia, but even in the Indus Valley.

3. Middle Aramaic - roughly 200 B.C. to 200 A.D. This phase includes the emergence of real local dialects, including the dialects of: a) Palestine and Arabia (Nabatean, Qumran, Murabba’at etc), b) Syria and Mesopotamia (Palmyra, Edessa and Hatra).

4. Late Aramaic - roughly 200 to 700 A.D. He accepts two large geographical subdivisions: a) Western (Jewish Palestinian Aramaic, Samaritan Aramaic and Christian Syro-Palestinian Aramaic), and b) Eastern (Syriac, Babylonian Talmudic Aramaic and Mandaic).

5. Modern Aramaic (with numerous dialects).

We may note that in this scheme, Fitzmyer does not employ the term “Ancient Aramaic” at all, and he does not use the term “Old Aramaic” for anything later than 700 B.C. For him, writings after 700 B.C. fall under Official Aramaic.

Beyer, on the other hand, uses the term “Old Aramaic” to cover not only the writings before the advent of Official Aramaic, but also includes Official Aramaic itself, and the later dialects of Old Eastern Aramaic and Old Western Aramaic. Thus he uses the term “Old Aramaic” to refer to everything written up until approximately 200 A.D. Since Beyer’s classification of “Old Aramaic” is far more inclusive than Fitzmyer’s, Beyer uses the term “Ancient Aramaic” to refer to that earliest period which is called Old Aramaic by Fitzmyer. And we may also note that what Fitzmyer calls Middle Aramaic is included under the rubric of Old Aramaic by Beyer, while Beyer’s Middle Aramaic begins after 200 A.D. and thus corresponds to Fitzmeyer’s Late Aramaic. Beyer’s classification may thus be summarized as follows:^[2]

I. Old Aramaic

A. Ancient Aramaic – 11th century B.C. to approximately 500 B.C.

B. Imperial Aramaic – The official language of the western part of the Persian empire from approx. 500 B.C. to approx. 200 A.D., but may be divided into various dialects beginning in the second century B.C.

C. Old Eastern Aramaic and Old Western Aramaic – largely contemporary with Imperial Aramaic, but not used for official documents.

II. Middle Aramaic – from approx. 200 A.D. and extending throughout the Middle Ages.

A. Eastern Middle Aramaic

B. Western Middle Aramaic

III. Modern Aramaic (modern Eastern, modern Western and modern Mandaic)

[edit] Notes

[edit] References