Talk:Odalisque

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Odalisque article.

Article policies
WikiProject Turkey This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Turkey, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Turkey-related topics. Please visit the the participants page if you would like to get involved. Happy editing!
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
edit · history · watch · refresh To-do list for Odalisque:

No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category

align="left" This article is part of WikiProject Gender Studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
??? This article has not yet received a rating.

Note: Part of this article is taken from the public domain 1913 edition of Webster's Dictionary. -- Karada 16:09, 4 Dec 2003 (UTC)

[edit] Concubine or not?

An odalisque was a female slave or concubine in the Ottoman Seraglio […] An odalisque was not a concubine of the harem

Ian Spackman 09:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Images

Currently there are two images, both depicting the European orientalist erotic fantasy version of the odalisque. This seems out of balance considering how controversial and discredited this form of bourgeois pornography has become, gorgeous though the paintings are. Surely a single image of such a painting would be more appropriate, ideally set against another image representing a very different point of view. Ireneshusband 18:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC)