Talk:Nuclear power in Finland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Energy This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, which collaborates on articles related to energy.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article is on a subject of mid importance within energy.

This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Planning

The source cited in this section does not support the statements there at all. Not even remotely. The planning section states that renewables are not being developed due to monopoly conditions. The PDF cites environmental concerns, a lack of capacity for hydro-electric power and local opposition to wind mills! As such I've changed the planning section to reflect this. If someone wants to revert it, then they need to find an impartial source. I suspect whoever added this in was anti-nuclear and was simply hoping no one would actually check the source. I've also added the page number for future reference, if anyone would like to read it. Hvatum (talk) 06:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Other Comments

This page seems to be side-tracked with poorly spelled bits about a lack of renewable energy; such items should be in a different article, perhaps 'renewable engergy politics in Finland' or something along those lines. Joezasada (talk) 22:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

This article has multiple problems; tagged accordingly. Aside from those noted above,
1) It appears to have been written by a non-native English speaker. Corrections & rewrite needed. (Started)
2) NPOV problem, especially in the "Under construction" section. Pretty serious issue here. (Fixed by heavy pruning)
3) Pie-chart overlaps text. (Sort-of fixed)
4) I moved the under construction section, and hacked away some of the irrelevancies. Still needs more work. Pete Tillman (talk) 04:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Added info, cleaned up, removed tag. Still could use more work... Pete Tillman (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC)