From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the NuBus article.
|
|
|
|
Article policies
|
| This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
| WikiProject Computing (Rated Start-Class) |
|
|
This article is within the scope of Computing WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to computers and computing. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale |
| WikiProject Macintosh (Rated Start-Class) |
|
|
This article is part of WikiProject Macintosh. This means that the WikiProject has identified it as an article pertaining to the Macintosh, but is not currently working to improve it. WikiProject Macintosh itself is an attempt to improve, grow, standardize, and attain featured status for Wikipedia's articles related to Macintosh and Apple Inc. We need all your help, so join in today! |
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| High |
This article is on a subject of High-importance within Macs for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. |
|
[edit] Date of development
When was NuBus developed at MIT? Having that information in the article will really help those not familiar with the NuMachine project. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by EagleOne (talk • contribs) 20:28, 23 November 2004 (UTC-7)
[edit] Remove ISA reference
2005.Aug.01 - Edited out reference to ISA cards needing to be configured for particular slots. The ISA bus was a 'dumb' bus that couldn't tell which card was plugged in to which slot. Only more advanced busses like PCI actually distinguish slots with ID numbers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.61.70.19 (talk • contribs) 13:42, 1 August 2005 (UTC-7)
[edit] OldBus?
Since NuBus is technologically obsolete now, shouldn't it be called OldBus? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.152.9.106 (talk • contribs) 14:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC-7)