NSPCC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) is a UK charity campaigning and working in child protection and the prevention of cruelty to, and abuse of, children.

The NSPCC lobbies the government on issues relating to child welfare, and creates campaigns for the general public, with the intention of raising awareness of child protection issues.

It also operates both the NSPCC Child Protection Helpline, offering support to anyone concerned about a child, and Childline offering support to children themselves. The NSPCC merged with Childline in 1996. In addition to the telephone helplines, NSPCC runs a similar online service called there4me.com.

The charity also runs 177 local services[1]. These offer general family support, as well as more specific services such as working with families with alcohol problems.

The NSPCC is the only UK charity which has been granted statutory powers under the Children Act 1989, allowing it to apply for care and supervision orders for children at risk. [2] As of June 2007, the NSPCC operated ten teams of child protection social workers.[3]

Contents

[edit] History

The first child cruelty case in Britain was brought by the RSPCA; the court charge list described the affected child as "a small animal", because at the time there were no laws in Britain to protect children from mistreatment. This case was successful.

The NSPCC was founded in 1884 as the London Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (London SPCC)[4] by Benjamin Waugh. After five years of campaigning by the London SPCC, Parliament passed the first ever UK law to protect children from abuse and neglect in 1889. The London SPCC was renamed the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children in 1889[4], because by then it had branches across Great Britain and Ireland.

The NSPCC was granted its Royal Charter in 1895, when Queen Victoria became its first Royal Patron. It did not change its title to "Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children" or similar, as the name NSPCC was already well established, and to avoid confusion with the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA), which had already existed for more than fifty years. Today, the NSPCC works in England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Channel Islands. Children 1st - formerly the Royal Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children - is the NSPCC's equivalent in Scotland. The NSPCC's organisation in the Republic of Ireland was taken up by the newly-founded Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (ISPCC) in March 1954.

In February 2006, the charity ChildLine joined together with the NSPCC.

Since 2002, the Chairman of the NSPCC has been Sir Christopher Kelly KCB, formerly a senior Civil Servant. The Chief Executive is Dame Mary Marsh DBE.

[edit] Values

The NSPCC's stated core values are based on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

They are:

  • Children must be protected from all forms of violence and exploitation
  • Everyone has a responsibility to support the care and protection of children
  • We listen to children and young people, respect their views and respond to them directly
  • Children should be encouraged and enabled to fulfil their potential
  • We challenge inequalities for children and young people
  • Every child must have someone to turn to

[edit] Campaigning and controversy

The NSPCC's campaigning role has often been controversial. The Guardian has claimed that a report by New Philanthropy Capital recently concluded that its campaigning is "flawed and naive" and that there is "zero evidence" that £250m the NSPCC has spent on its recent "Full Stop" campaign actually benefited any children [5].

The NSPCC also received complaints, amongst other things, for "cold" mailing young mothers with a "babies' names" booklet containing instead a detailed list of the deaths of babies.[6] The charity also supports mandatory sex education for all children, and has argued against the view that marriage is necessarily the only way to create stable relationships [2].

In recent years, the charity has faced criticism for its stance on contact visits to children following parents' separation. The NSPCC has consistently opposed an automatic right of contact for both parents, arguing that this is not necessarily in the best interests of the child. This stance has led to criticism both in parliament [7] and by the fathers' rights group Fathers4Justice. In fact, in 2004 the London headquarters of NSPCC were briefly invaded and occupied by Fathers4Justice supporters, claiming that the NSPCC "ignores the plight of 100 children a day who lose contact with their fathers" and that they promote a "portrayal of men as violent abusers."[8]

The NSPCC also faced criticism for failing (along with other organizations) to do enough to help Victoria Climbié and prevent her death, and also for misleading the inquiry into her death.[9].

The organisation has also faced criticism for its allegedly increasing obsession with publicity and advertising, for fear mongering[10][11] and supposedly fabricating or exaggerating facts and figures in its research. In an article on Spiked, Frank Furedi professor of sociology at the University of Kent, branded it a "lobby group devoted to publicising its peculiar brand of anti-parent propaganda and promoting itself."[12]

The NSPCC responded to criticism about it's spending suggesting that raising awareness of child cruelty was essential and that lobbying was more effective than direct projects.[13] David Hinchliffe, Labour MP, supported this approach, stating that the NSPCC's role should be about raising awareness.[13]

Criticism has also come from anti-gay campaigners due to the charities support for reducing the homosexual age of consent to 16. Conservative MP Gerald Howarth withdrew his support for the Full Stop campaign due to the charities support for this legislation. [13]

[edit] Satanic ritual abuse scandal

During the late 1980s and early 1990s, a moral panic emerged over alleged ritual satanic abuse. The NSPCC provided a publication known as 'Satanic Indicators' to social services around the country that has been blamed for some social workers panicing and making false accusations. The most prominent of these cases was in Rochdale in 1990 when up to 20[14] children were taken from their homes and parents after social services believed them to be involved in satanic or occult ritual abuse. The allegations were later found out to be false. The case was the subject of a BBC documentary which featured recordings of the interviews made by NSPCC social workers, revealing that flawed techniques and leading questions were used to gain evidence of abuse from the children. The documentary claimed that the social services were wrongly convinced, by organisations such as the NSPCC, that abuse was occurring and so rife that they made allegations before any evidence was considered.[15][16]

See also:

Susan J. Creighton, "Organized Abuse: The NSPCC Experience", Child Abuse Review; Volume 2, Issue 4 (1993), p. 232-242.

Jean La Fontaine, The Extent and Nature of Organised and Ritual Sexual Abuse of Children, HMSO, 1994.

and for a fuller account:

Jean La Fontaine, Speak of the Devil: Tales of Satanic Abuse in Contemporary England, Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Department of Health and Social Services Inspectorate. North West Region, Inspection of child protection services in Rochdale , Manchester: Social Services Inspectorate. North West Region, 1990, viii, 33pp.

Clyde, James J., The report of the inquiry into the removal of children from Orkney in February 1991 , Edinburgh : HMSO , 1992, xiv, 363pp. ISBN: 0102195935.

Department of Health and Social Security and Welsh Office, Working Together: a guide to arrangements for inter-agency co-operation for the protection of children from abuse , London : HMSO, 1988, 72pp. ISBN: 0113211546.

Eleanor Stobart, Child abuse linked to accusations of "possession" and "witchcraft", Nottingham : Department for Education and Skills, 2006.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ NSPCC FAQ. NSPCC. Retrieved on 2008-04-01.
  2. ^ Children's Act 1989. Retrieved on 2008-04-02.
  3. ^ Independent Enquiry and Assessment Service. Retrieved on 2008-04-03.
  4. ^ a b About the NSPCC. Retrieved on 2007-09-19.
  5. ^ "Full Stop Missing", The Guardian, 2007-08-01. Retrieved on 2007-11-27. 
  6. ^ "Mailshock", The Guardian, 2006-10-03. Retrieved on 2007-09-19. 
  7. ^ [1]
  8. ^ "Protesters enter charity offices", BBC, 2004-11-15. Retrieved on 2007-09-19. 
  9. ^ It Needs To Be Stopped. Full Stop. The Guardian (2002-02-19). Retrieved on 2007-09-19.
  10. ^ Why this NSPCC advert is harmful to children
  11. ^ A Stranger Danger
  12. ^ Furedi, Frank (2004-01-19). A danger to the nation's children. Spiked. Retrieved on 2007-09-19.
  13. ^ a b c NSPCC hits back over cash
  14. ^ Satanic abuse: The truth at last
  15. ^ When Satan Came To Town.
  16. ^ Cummings, Dolan (2006-01-12). A full stop to the Satanic panic. Spiked. Retrieved on 2007-09-19.

[edit] External links