Talk:Novelty (locomotive)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Novelty (locomotive) was a good article, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Delisted version: May 23, 2007

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance within the Trains WikiProject.
This article is within the scope of the Locomotives task force.


To-do
list

Pending tasks for Novelty (locomotive):

(purge cache –  edit this list)
  • Rewrite the lead section to give a complete overview and summary of the article
  • Complete the specifications in the infobox
  • Research and add a few more references and add inline citations as appropriate
See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains/Todo

"Only the wheels under the firebox (those to the left on the illustration here) were driven, the other wheels were not connected to the drive in any way." However, there are two drawings which are facing opposite directions. I guess this refers to the first one? This should be made clear. SpaceCaptain 15:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

This problem recurs throughout the description. Have removed the second drawing, as it confuses matters (and does not show anything not in the first drawing). -- Picapica 09:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "No other" claim

I don't quite follow the "no other locos built this way" claim. As described it appears to be very similar to the "Tom Thumb (locomotive)" and some other early Baltimore and Ohio Railroad locomotives. For now, I've qualified the statement to reflect a British context. Mangoe 16:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Delisted GA

This article has been delisted for failure to meet current GA criteria. Once the article has been brought up to standards, it may be renominated at WP:GAC. If you have any questions regarding this delisting, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Additionally, if you feel this delisting was made in error, you may request remediation at WP:GA/R. Regards, LaraLoveT/C 05:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)