Talk:Nova M Radio

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Does this meet the notability requirements of Wikipedia? Please comment. Thanks Dubc0724 20:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Let it stay, AAR and Nova M may eventually become one and the same. At that point we can merge the articles and redirect the links to the one corporate page. As for notability requirements, there are articles of far less note on wikipedia so I don't see any reason to remove it. Someone took the time to write the article, which is actually pretty well written and NPOV for what seems like a first draft (judging by the lack of "Talk" and age of the last entry); we should appreciate that effort.Vinnievesh 06:09, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

With their current efforts as a startup radio network, I do believe Nova M will become even more noteworthy in the months to come. I do believe they are notable. I wrote the original article, though it is in dire need of updating. --Fightingirish 15:30, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Compare this with the discussion of Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Genesis_Communications_Network. The rationale for deletion seemed to center around the number of affiliates, lack of notability of its hosts (Barry Lynn is probably more notable than any host on Nova M), and lack of web site traffic. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - potential of future notability doesn't make an article's subject notable.StreamingRadioGuide 20:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)