From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
/test
[edit] Refractory period (sex)
Please note that your edits on Refractory period (sex) are in violation of the Wikipedia three revert rule and you are in danger of being blocked. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
You have been
blocked from editing for a period of
24 hours in accordance with
Wikipedia's blocking policy for
violation of the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may
contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|
your reason here}} below.
—C.Fred (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- How can I be blocked but not the other guy and his sock puppets? Notespace 17:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "reverting someone's attempt to place their own personal beliefs into an accurate stable version - refer to User:Graham87's edits on 2nd Sept 2007 at 08.52 and 08.54. thanks"
Decline reason: "WIthout getting into the content dispute itself, you did edit war. Please take some time and when you come back, discuss changes on the talk page.— Navou banter 18:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
- It takes two to edit war. All parties were warned; all parties were blocked for reverting after the warning. —C.Fred (talk) 18:22, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
