User talk:NorVegan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Pakistan Peoples Party

Thanks for experimenting with the page Pakistan Peoples Party on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. SMS Talk 23:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Pakistan Peoples Party. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. SMS Talk 09:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I think before doing any more edits we should better discuss it, and make edit after a consensus! --SMS Talk 10:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
That's fine. The main text reads "The Pakistan Peoples Party... is a centre-left political party in Pakistan affiliated to the Socialist International." I think you would find that the consensus on individualist anarchism is that it is right-wing or at the very least right-of-centre. The parties in the Socialist International are social democratic or democratic socialist, ie. left-of-centre. I think the idea of the state and a welfare system in social democratic ideology clashes with the tenets of individualist anarchism. NorVegan (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Ya! you are absolutely true! My apologies if i understood it wrong! but what do you say about the party being chaired by a single family and the chairperson ship is transferred from one generation to another in a single family? --SMS Talk 10:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
No need to apologise. What's democratic in theory, is not necessarily so in reality. Single family transfer of power is common in authoritarian systems, e.g. monarchy. It does seem like the Bhuttos have had the support of their constituency, though. NorVegan (talk) 11:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)