Talk:Northern Caracara

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
Northern Caracara is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Brazil and Brazil-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
SICA ZP This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Central America, which collaborates on articles related to Central America. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject Birds Northern Caracara is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. Please do not substitute this template.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] =Mexican flag

Discrepancy: That bird is not on the Mexican flag, the correct bird is the golden eagle

Eating snakes while perched on a cactus is more like a caracara, but the bird symbol is mythological anyway. It is an eagle, no matter what the legendary original observation was of (Hard to think that a state would choose a vulture-falcon to represent itself when there were eagles available...) Dysmorodrepanis 01:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Subspecies

HBW2 lists 4 extant (Tres Marias, Northern, Central, Southern America, basically). What happened? Dysmorodrepanis 01:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

  • see Carla J. Dove & Richard C. Banks, 1999. Link given under references in article itself. Rabo3 (talk) 13:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Binomial name

I've also seen it referred to as Caracara plancus, a combination of the two already mentioned in the article. What's up with that? --Ptcamn 15:07, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Teaxo review?

I think I got it: check Auk 117:847, the AOU split it in 2000. Since it's "their" bird, I guess it's good. Dysmorodrepanis 22:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Photos

Are the photos true? Commons: Polyborus (Caracara) plancus !!!--Ben Skála (talk) 16:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)