User talk:NoConviction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It is a Pitty I did not work for total Removal of all responsibilty and another pay rise

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Roads and Traffic Authority. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wongm (talk) 15:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Mike Kelly (politician), you will be blocked from editing. Wongm (talk) 15:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pseudomonas_(talk) 15:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:NoConviction

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pseudomonas_(talk) 16:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

I have made Telephone calls, and sent faxes to gain information

I have sent faxes to the ACTU and CMFEU about the illegal road side advertisments and recived no reply.

I have sent emails and telephones the NSW RTA, and NSW State Debit Recovery services for the cost of illegal road side advertisments and recived no reply that could be used to provide a cost (a copy of email transcript was included in the NSW RTA edit which was reverted by a ALP member who maintains the Mike Kelly (Aussie poly) page.

Images and text have been deleted by the same group of users, at the same times of day, or more than one time. Some of the same users that belong to this group also span other web sites with abuse, span, and political messages which are not appropiate.

I have taken photo images which none of your editors bothered to provide while generating one sided history

Could one of your wiki editors provide alternaive images from 2007 of registered road side advertisments that had work-cover approval, had payed regulation fees, and was to size and shape as required by Australian law.

In-fact the editors have attempted to remove images of illegal activity to promote their own self interests, or that of another.

Requested delection but refused to reply on talk page for request to provide advise

The editor who requested the deletion of this page refused to reply to a talk message before seeking removal, instead the time shows the editor deleted the page when it was reverted back from being blanked.

If the editor should suggest better text or which text was offending then I would be happy to comply.

Suggestion

Wikipedia is not a soapbox, it's an encyclopedia. If you want to discuss politics, please feel free to set up your own web site, or use one of the many free web hosts out there, or go to a forum for discussing politics. Pseudomonas_(talk) 17:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello Pseudomonas See the next post. Could you please take the 'Wikipedia is not a soapbox' ideals and assert them on someone else you have power over.

I have provided 100% fact in my own words with images to the best of my ability (if your education allows you to work faster, and generate better text then please add your contribution, or you have a time machine to provide images from 2007 that you removed.

A dislike of something does not mean it is not of FACT. Thankyou for the late suggestion afer administration action was taken to assert the false ideal of soapboxing (NoConviction (talk) 17:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC))

NoConviction, from Canberra Australia; with a code of practice issued by the Government and images of law breaking

The code of practice may include, but is not limited to, matters relating to—

(a) the materials from which, and the methods by which, a sign may be constructed; and

(b) the sizes of signs; and

(c) the locations where a sign may be placed; and

(d) the words or images that may be displayed on a sign; and

(e) how the person responsible for a sign may be identified; and

(f) the number of signs that a person may place or keep in a public place; and

(g) the requirements relating to insurance that a person who places or keeps a sign in a public place must satisfy.

12C Failure to comply with code

A person shall not, without reasonable excuse, place or keep a movable sign in, over or across a public place, except in accordance with the code of practice.

Maximum penalty:

(a) for a contravention of the code relating to insurance—50 penalty units; or

(b) in any other case—10 penalty units.

(c) Nothing for a drink driving minister

Image names are correct

For the Images of:

[1] 2007 ALP Crime Syndicates.gif

[2] Active Pedophiles with Illegal advertisment rights at work.gif

Ref:

[1] A criminal syndicate is that of a group of persons that knownly commit criminal offence/s WHILE or even WHILE NOT supporting the attempt of another human to achive a Government Office. As shown above the signage material supplied for the illegal act was from the Australian Labor Party, thus ALP in the file name.

[2] Pedophile is: n. a person, thing, or scheme who/that/does remove/s right/s from a child or children, and person not of adult age - perhaps even discribed on wiki

Good thing my RPL is only 4.5 isn't it... So I just saved the entire lot in backtrack for later use.

(NoConviction (talk) 17:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC))

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely for using Wikipedia as a platform for political protest. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|reason for unblock here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Daniel Case (talk) 17:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)