Talk:No Country for Old Men
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
McCarthy's prose is engaging if not downright addictive and as such is easily consumed.
I've pulled it for now, but would happy to see it go back in as a quote from a review or some such. --Dvyost 06:12, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Cormac McCarthy NoCountryForOldMen.jpg
Image:Cormac McCarthy NoCountryForOldMen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Plot point?
The recent addition of the type of gun that a character uses seems to have been added just for shock value. The plot description at the moment is very short and the clarification of the gun does not seem significant plot wise. I have left it in for the moment but an expansion of the plot description would probably be necessary to justify such details being added. Ferengi 04:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wrong link for William J. Cobb
Wrong link for William J. Cobb:
The link for william J. Cobb here does not take one to the right William J. Cobb:
Literary significance and criticism
William J. Cobb, in a review published in the Houston Chronicle (July 15, 2005),
suggest that the link be removed, as there does not seem to be a wikipedia entry for the correct william j. cobb. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.137.176.115 (talk) 17:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Cormac McCarthy NoCountryForOldMen.jpg
Image:Cormac McCarthy NoCountryForOldMen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Plot Summary False as Written
The plot revolves around the protagonist's return to the scene (unmentioned here). This is the central, and controversially uninterpreted decision of the central character from which all else flows, and the reason he could be trailed for the rest of the film. Whether the last survivor he encountered lived to see anyone else is never known, and very likely wholly inconsequential in every respect. That isn't even a plot point, much less the central plot point as alleged here. Granted, it is possible to imagine that our protagonist returned to kill this witness after sleeping on it, but I've yet to meet anyone who has interpreted the book in this way, actually.
The other most noteworthy fact about the plot, and book, is that the author dares to have the central event (the protagonist's death) occur offstage, violating all narrative convention (although respecting how the death's of those we care about usually impact our lives) simply outraging many readers (most notably Aristotle.) This wee fact about the plot also goes unmentioned here.
The most notable consequences of the protagonists decisions - the death of his wife, and his killing of a bystander, also go unmentioned!
"Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.68.244.96 (talk) 15:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Redirect
Would it be possible to make the search No Country for Old Men redirect to a disambiguation that includes both the movie and the novel? --Nick4404 yada yada yada 03:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

