Talk:Nitrogenase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject This article is within the scope of the Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject. To participate, visit the WikiProject for more information. The WikiProject's current monthly collaboration is focused on improving Restriction enzyme.

Article Grading: The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit · history · refresh · how to use this template)


The article is extremely important, the reaction is perhaps the 2nd most fundamental bio-reaction after photosynthesis.

I don't want to grade this, but I do believe there is an error here. I am not [yet?] a registered wikian, so someone else may want to make this change. I will, however, freely identify myself:

John R. Hoaglund, III, Ph.D. Senior hydrogeologist Geotrans Inc. [formerly with Penn State University] Irvine, CA 92614

My edit [ this same edit may apply to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_fixation ]:

In this sentence:

"Since this reaction does not occur very often, and in fact goes the other way more easily, with ammonia breaking down into nitrogen and hydrogen, without nitrogenase, there would be much less life than presently exists."

the clause:

"..., and in fact goes the other way more easily, ..." is in error. The thermodynamics of the reaction:

N2(g) + 3H2(g) → 2NH3(g)

has a Gibbs Free energy of -33.3 kJ/mol, and thus runs most favorably in the direction written.

Though the article lists the reaction as N2 + 6H + energy → 2NH3, the full reaction that occurs is what I list above. The reaction written in the article with "6H" should at least be written as "6H+" (perhaps the H+ is provided by an acid...otherwise hydrogen occurs diatomically as H2). It is possible that the reaction N2 + 6H+ + energy → 2NH3 is correctly asserted as energetically favorable in the other direction [I haven't checked the thermo on that]. It may also be possible that the reaction I've written would be energetically favorable in the other direction if the phases were aqueous (i.e. dissolved), written as (aq), rather than gases, written as (g). Again, I haven't checked the thermo on that either. However, the net reaction is what I have written. The reaction is important enough to include the phases and the correct associated thermodynamics.

The main issue / problem with the reaction is not the thermodynamics, but rather that the kinetics are extremely slow at room temperature. Thus, very large activation energies are required to get the reaction started. Thus the reaction only runs in the presence of certain enzymes (biological catalysts) biologically [namely nitrogenase], or in the presence of catalysts [usually Fe ] + high temperature + high pressure industrially (The Haber-Bosch process).

Please add this reference when editing:

Alberty*,Robert A., 2005. Thermodynamics of the mechanism of the nitrogenase reaction. Biophysical Chemistry, Volume 114, Issues 2-3, Pages 115-120.

Date of publication: April 22, 2005

  • Dept. of Chemistry, MIT

Abstract

The fixation of molecular nitrogen by nitrogenase requires a lot of energy because 16 mol of ATP are hydrolyzed per mole of nitrogen converted to ammonia. Kim and Dees determined the crystallograpic structure of nitrogenase and this has led to a three-step mechanism that involves Feprotein and MoFeprotein in addition to ferredoxin. Each of these steps can be interpreted in terms of two half reactions that are connected through their transfer of electrons. Estimates can be made of the standard apparent reduction potentials of these three steps and their dependencies on pH and ionic strength. This mechanism is compared with the same type of analysis of an alternative three-step mechanism in which the hydrolysis of ATP is coupled with the reduction of molecular nitrogen, rather than the reduction of Feprotein. The problem with the first mechanism is that the second step produces 12 mol of hydrogen ions per mole of nitrogen fixed and the third step consumes 10 mol of hydrogen ions per mole of nitrogen fixed. The alternative mechanism does not have this problem.

[edit] Edits

Largely have not changed the content, but have:

1. Broken up paragraphs. 2. Done wiki linking. As you can see, there are several terms that don't have articles, or at least, not in the form of the term used. 3. Elaborated somewhat more, taking things a bit more step by step. The original editor(s) clearly knew their biochemistry, but assumed, I think, a bit more expertise on the part of our readers than empirical experience indicates to be warranted. 4. Wrote a very high level outline of the process without all of the qualifications. If a lay reader comes away with the understanding that nitrogenase breaks three chemical bonds, one at a time, and the result is ammonia, we are in good shape.

Stirling Newberry 16:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kinetic stability of NH3

I have corrected the line

"Since this reaction does not occur very often, and in fact goes the other way more easily, with ammonia breaking down into nitrogen and hydrogen, without nitrogenase, there would be much less life than presently exists."

As the formation of ammonia from 1/3H2 and 1/2N2 does in fact have a negative enthalpy of reaction. As Dr. Hoaglund notes, ammonia production is a problem of kinetic stability of the reactants. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eutactic (talkcontribs) 06:25, 14 April 2008 (UTC)