User talk:Nickptar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Thanks!
Enigma message 02:48, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for your action
Thanks for your intervention in removing the Request for Delete for entry FINSAS. regards Arunram (talk) 17:51, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Can someone help me please? I tried to edit a article for the Hp Indigo and it says I can't edit due to vandalism. Ive never edited a article before so what vandalism have I done? I believe the only thing Ive ever done on here was talk on a discussion page about the HP Indigo and Men In Trees. I'm very new to Wikipedia so I'm not sure what Ive done wrong.Thanks in advance.--68.19.248.164 (talk) 02:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User:JTWoodsworth
User:JTWoodsworth has been constantly adding the text "Indiana Jones and the Saucer Men from Mars" to every article he can, and has been constantly recreated pages redirected by administrators. He has ignored the consensus on the Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull talk page that it was not notable enough. The only way this user will stop is if he is blocked. ColdFusion650 (talk) 17:58, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Whoa. Thank you for the information. ~~ N (t/c) 18:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- And he did it again. He will not stop on his own. ColdFusion650 (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- And he's done it again and again. I won't redirect it, on the chance that it may count as a revert, or some such as that. ColdFusion650 (talk) 19:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- He also violated the 3RR again on the main Crystal Skull page. ColdFusion650 (talk) 19:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- And he's done it again and again. I won't redirect it, on the chance that it may count as a revert, or some such as that. ColdFusion650 (talk) 19:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- And he did it again. He will not stop on his own. ColdFusion650 (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Taleb
Your comments about Taleb and Black Swan on my talkpage are incorrect. Taleb's books the Black Swan and Fooled by Randomness and his current profession have nothing to do with the Libertarian Party. The Black Swan theory is clearly not a political theory. LoveMonkey (talk) 23:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- You miss my point; I'm not claiming that the theory has anything to do with political libertarianism, only that it has nothing to do with free will or Dostoevsky, and that Taleb's one reference to libertarianism you mention is to the political kind. I have removed the links again. ~~ N (t/c) 00:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
??? The Black Swan is a representation or articulation of the long standing tradition of Cappadocian Pyrrhonism. Taleb states that not me. Notes from Underground gives the same logical arguments against Platonicity as Pyrrhonism does. Randomness gives the wiggle room needed to validate the freewill (and I am not speaking strictly on the subatomic particle level). What do you need Professor Taleb to specifically say in order for the link to be added? LoveMonkey (talk) 13:14, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re:
Yeah I am aware. I was using huggle and I hit the wrong button. (I can't link to the edit now that the page is deleted, but I did at least attempt to put the correct tag on it after I did that.) thanks for letting me know about it. Also, you may want to salt that page if you haven't already done so because according to this, that's the fourth recreation. Thanks again. Thingg⊕⊗ 20:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Marish Puri
The real problem with that page is that its just a typo for Amrish Puri, who already has a substantial article. It could have been made a redirect, but it seems unlikely that many other people would make the same mistake. - SimonP (talk) 17:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
