Talk:Nicolás Millán

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
  • Is it possible to change the name of the article to Nicolás Millán. Kurt000 18:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
    Done. ugen64 22:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Thank You (sorry my reply is late) Kurt000 17:57, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] West Ham

I reverted the anon adding West Ham transfer rumours, rather than just adding the cn tag. The reason for this is that there are absolutely no results on Google News, neither in the Archives, nor in the past month. It's probably just the usual wishful thinking from a fan, that happens across all of these kinds of articles. Of course, with a citation, I would not be against it going back in at all. --Dreaded Walrus t c 10:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I was going to revert it, but was unsure even though I did check google and found little/no results, so i added {{Fact}}. But thanks for clearing it up and now I will know what to do in future situations.Kurt000 15:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Of course, my opinion is far from authoritative, that's just my personal way of seeing it. You see, for me, as the two other "teams linked with" things in this article (Chelsea and AC Milan) both have sources cited, I just feel that anything like that, unless similarly sourced to a reliable source, should probably be removed as just wishful thinking, or something they've heard on a forum or some such. Usually I'll revert a non-cited, unconvincing edit (as seen here), and then if I find proof, I'll revert myself and add it (as seen here, with typo fixes added). --Dreaded Walrus t c 16:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)