Talk:New York State Route 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article New York State Route 8 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
May 3, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics New York State routes
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force.

[edit] GA review

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    There is a sentence in the #Utica area: "At the exit, the three states are joined..." I think the word "routes" is missing there.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Some photos would be nice, but not necessary for a GA
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Looks good to me. The issues in the prose are trivial.

Imzadi1979 (talk) 17:28, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me? One whole section is unsourced. I've made a post at WT:GAN about this. D.M.N. (talk) 17:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Issue corrected. --Rschen7754 (T C) 17:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
OK, looks better. D.M.N. (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2008 (UTC)