Talk:New Moon (novel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class. | ||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to children's and young adult literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
|
Tasks you can do:
|
|||
Contents |
[edit] lovable, attractive ...
"They have such a tender regard for one another despite, or maybe because of, Jacob being the complete opposite of Edward. Jacob is lovable, awkward, humanly attractive and warm-blooded." lalalalalalala These sentences make it sound like Edward is not lovable or attractive. Someone NEEDS to change this! thanks
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Newmoon2.jpeg
Image:Newmoon2.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- I beleive I have added a fair use rational. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thank You. -Bella 18:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
User IP numder 84.39.69.159 seems to have done this. Which I'm pretty sure is vandalism. I'm not sure how to handle it, so just so everyone knows, here it is. ~Bella 22:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I saw that too. That is vandalism. As of now, it wouldn't be all that big of a deal, but if the user does it again, you can create a talk page for that user if he doesn't have one already and post a vandalism warning. That's usually how to handle the situation. Spottedstar 02:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Plot summary
Hmm... it's very long. Ashleyy osaurus (talk) 11:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Alright I cut it down, but it's still quite long. I'll work on it more some time soon. Andrea (talk) 23:24, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
i like the plot summaries to be long. i mean, i'm always wanting info, and little wussy plot summaries drive me crazy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.100.247.189 (talk) 11:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
...then just read the book. SoulReaverDan (talk) 22:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
It sort of spoils the entire book = doesn't it? The marriage comment is way over the top - it totally recks it when you read it. Can we descale it a little?Heytaytay99 (talk) 04:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- As said here, if you don't want the book spoiled, then don't go to the article page. It's necessary to have an overview of the plot, but we don't need to take away from it to take away spoilers. ~ Bella Swan? 11:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Motorcycles
I just want something to be changed. When Bella first bought the motorcycles she wasn't intending to hear Edward's voice. She thought the delusion had been triggered by Deja Vu. She got the bikes to break her promise to him (since she felt he had broken his promise that it would be "as if he never existed" since she could not forget him). When she heard his voice on the bike she realised she only heard it when she was in danger. She was not aware of this fact until after her first time riding it.
P.S. Bella did not find the bikes on the side of a road. She saw them for sale outside of a boy's house, and they were in such bad condition that he gave them to her for free. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FlowerQueen (talk • contribs) 18:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
