Talk:New Jewish Agenda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New Jewish Agenda is part of WikiProject Judaism, a project to improve all articles related to Judaism. If you would like to help improve this and other articles related to the subject, consider joining the project. All interested editors are welcome. This template adds articles to Category:WikiProject Judaism articles.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
New Jewish Agenda is part of WikiProject Palestine - a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page where you can add your name to the list of members and contribute to the discussion. This template adds articles to Category:WikiProject Palestine articles.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.

[edit] Two things

Two things: Jewish Peace Fellowship (JPF) was not a spin-off from NJA. JPF has been around since AT LEAST World War II, and has been active in draft resistance during several wars since then. Also -- I was in Agenda in the early days, and I recall that a politically conservative bet din (rabbincal court) somewhere on the East Coast (Boston?) excommunicated any Jew that joined Agenda. This was regarded as a joke by most people. Anybody remember more about this incident? Rooster613 13:47, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Rooster613


  • Thanks for your edit -- here's a piece of my thesis (just linked to it on this page)that refers to your second question. I looked for info to include about the excommunication based on your above question.

"Though NJA members identified their activism as explicitly Jewish, they were met with mixed and often critical response from the larger Jewish community. Perhaps the most extreme example of this critical response was the November 1992 excommunication [1] of NJA members performed by three Tewksbury, MA rabbis. A more mainstream example of NJA's marginalization is the fact that NJA was not listed in the American Jewish Committee's American Jewish Yearbook until 1986."

[edit] Lot of work

Checking back in on this page I am excited to see that someone did a lot of work on it, and also a little startled to find the text of my online thesis/website about NJA pretty much cut and pasted onto this site without acknowledging that the text is my writing and research from the website linked on this site at www.newjewishagenda.org

So - whoever did this editing, thank you! And I hope that folks who are interested in this group will check out the lengthier analysis on my website. --Emily Nepon (emily at selfeducation dot org)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:NJA.jpg

Image:NJA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)