Talk:Netherlands national football team
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The edits I just reverted are not just of 82.156.71.55 (talk · contribs), who added Pierre van Hooijdonk, Dirk Kuyt and Robin van Persie to the list of famous players, but also of 62.252.128.18 (talk · contribs), who claimed that the Dutch national football team had won the 1930 World Cup. The latter is obviously not true. I also believe that Van Hooijdonk, Kuyt and Van Persie are not yet famous and prominent enough to be included in the Famous Players section. Kuyt has now played 10 matches for the Dutch national team. Van Persie has a promising future, but he has only played 2 matches for the national team. Van Hooijdonk has played 46 matches for the Dutch national team, but most of these were as a substitute. I believe he has started in the starting line-up only 4 times. Aecis 12:38, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Province flags
I removed the province flags, because I thought they were very confusing (at first I thought WTF?). Even most Dutch people don't know all the province flags, and I don't think knowing which province a player comes from is all that important. I'm sorry about the work that must've gone in it. Junes 16:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Nevermind... =_=' However, is it better with team logos? --necronudist 13:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
It hasn't got any purpose to put the flags of the provinces before the name of the player. I suggest that someone deletes them.
I agree, ditch the flags. To show how rediculous this is, I have put the flag of Morocco in front of Bouhlarouz. I think he will have more affinity with that than a stupid province flag!!
[edit] Projected Starting Line-Up and Formation
I replaced Johnny Heitinga for Joris Mathijsen, because Mathijsen is way more likely to play in the line-up than Johnny Heitinga. Mathijsen is left-footed and has been playing way more games in the national team lately than Heitinga.
[edit] Names
Sorry for my ignorance but could someone point me out the differences between Netherlands and Holland. thks .- (Jor70 16:58, 5 June 2006 (UTC))
- Holland is the major region in the Netherlands, but is very often used to mean the Netherlands, so it doesn't really matter. Officially, the nation is called the Netherlands.- KingPenguin 02:49, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thks. Jor70 17:55, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Team Uniform
I believe that the home jersey is just a plain orange jersey with the Nike and Holland logos on it. Bluedevil04 2:59, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah I was kind of wondering about what the deal with the outfit is. They played in all orange against serbia, yet the official shop shows the blue shorts/blue socks combination. So which is it? jaco♫plane 20:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
The official jersey is Orange, White and blue. The FIFA choised to obligate the team to play in all orange to define the teams better on black and white TV's
- I changed the colors slightly to more accurately reflect what I consider the nicest-looking uniform in FIFA...now using Cobalt blue and International orange. David Schroder 14:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
pattern_la1=|pattern_b1=_dutchhome07|pattern_ra1=| leftarm1=FF4F00|body1=FF4F00|rightarm1=FF4F00|shorts1=FFFFFF|socks1=0047AB| pattern_la2=|pattern_b2=_redwhitebluerightsash|pattern_ra2=| leftarm2=FFFFFF|body2=FFFFFF|rightarm2=FFFFFF|shorts2=0047AB|socks2=FFFFFF|
The Dutch jersey has a collar, though. FootyStavros 20:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- A "collar" is not to be depicted. Otherwise we could put true picture, couldn't we?--Uyet Ustranimii 23:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] History
Should this not be further split and expanded ? This is one of the greatest teams, surely some sections entitled something like "Early days" - pre-1950, "Total football" - 1970s, "European Champions" - 1980s/early 90s and "Recent"? Hardrada 19:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Van der Sar
Van der Sar has the same number of caps that F. De Boer...112
[edit] Strip?
Both strips look wrong to me. They played in all orange against Argentina, and I've never seen that 'away strip'. Can someone fix it please? --Guinnog 18:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- That was FIFA's idea, to let them play all orange in the group matches. I am not sure about the forecoming matches though. The orange,white,blue home tenue was made official in february of this year. Intangible 18:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Olympic medal table
I think the olympic medal table looks a little out of place on this page (in the "Competitive record" section). There is no other information on the page and I sampled a few other national team pages and no one lists Olympic medals (perhaps because I sampled some that have never won any, but that seems doubtful). Any objections to removing the table? 71.10.182.93 03:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Argentina has their medals on their page, though I have no opinion on the medals table. KingPenguin 16:45, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- I wouldn't have a problem with its removal. --Guinnog 17:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cruijff missing WC78
The reason Cruijff did not play in Argentina was not related to the political situation in Argentina, but instead is believed to be due to him not wanting to be away from his family for long periods. Willem van Hanegem however did chose not to play because of the political situation.--82.41.245.102 12:08, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think you are mistaken, see Talk:Johan Cruijff and the reference therein. --Guinnog 12:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that anyone (other than the man himself) really knows the reason, but there are also references that confirm what I stated above (http://fifa-world-cup-soccer-2006.deepthi.com/johan-cruyff.html). It may be more accurate to highlight this as well.--20.133.0.8 09:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] World War II reference
I removed that particular info from the EC 1988 section becaaaauuse it was inserted by a user who has trolled this page before. The only reason he edited the Nazi part into the text was to make the football supporters look bad, which means his intent isn't in accordance with WP:NPOV.
Besides, why should the Dutch football supporters from the eighties be singled out for referencing World War II (how childish it may be) - I know the English and The French supporters have done so as well in the past, yet their pages don't reflect any negative behavior. Igorrr 17:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Famous past players
Depending on manager, Davids, Kluivert and Makaay are still available for the national team. As long as players do not retire from international football themselves, it is prematurely to add them to the past players section. Had to remove Seedorf from the list for the same reason. But the evil, evil SportsAddicted re-added the three mentioned players to the past list again. May his dinner be poisoned. Razororz 14:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- LOL I'm not that evil my friend ;) The only reason for me to replace them back where they were is because they haven't been in the squad for over a year and are not likely to be called up again. I know Seedorf is now back in the squad and shouldn't be on there, but the others aren't in the squad yet and should be on the list of famous past players as they are no current players. It doesn't say famous retired players, but famous past players. SportsAddicted | discuss 16:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Then we have a difference of semantics, mate. In this context, 'past' and 'former' means pretty much the same to me, thus 'past players' indicates that the players retired from the team. Shouldn't Van Nistelrooy be added to the list if we apply your definition of the word? Razororz 19:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- former and past players are indeed sort of the same, retired players is different. In my opinion Van Nistelrooy should be in the list as soon as he drops out of the recent call ups section. It's not a big deal to remove a player from the famous past players when called up again, but he may become forgotten as soon as they are no longer part of the squad but not yet retired. SportsAddicted | discuss 19:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Razororz 19:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- former and past players are indeed sort of the same, retired players is different. In my opinion Van Nistelrooy should be in the list as soon as he drops out of the recent call ups section. It's not a big deal to remove a player from the famous past players when called up again, but he may become forgotten as soon as they are no longer part of the squad but not yet retired. SportsAddicted | discuss 19:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Then we have a difference of semantics, mate. In this context, 'past' and 'former' means pretty much the same to me, thus 'past players' indicates that the players retired from the team. Shouldn't Van Nistelrooy be added to the list if we apply your definition of the word? Razororz 19:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] World Cup History
The Dutch have been in 12 world cups and it says they've only been in 8
- That's because we've only been in 8 World Cups: 1934, 1938, 1974, 1978, 1990, 1994, 1998 and 2006. Aecis Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 22:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Licensing
Why is the Dutch football team never feautred in any football video games made after around 2001? Is the Dutch FA really stringent about its licensing laws, or something? Icanhearthegrassgrow 13:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
I think that they are like that about liscensing- It's the same with Rangers F.C and Arsenal F.C and Man Utd Jodie kennedy 18:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
They were in 2006 world cup game. 15:01, 26 september 2007 (UTC)
That's only because it was in the FIFA contract that participation would also mean giving portrait licenses to EA sports. - Dorkules 12:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New away jersey
There is a new away jersey for the dutch national team. I'm no good with the templates so here's a picture If someone could maske it an a template that would be fine. - Dorkules 12:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Competitive record section
Anyone know how to fix the placing of the "European Championship record" header in this section? Jameses (talk) 09:20, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Newawayjerseyholland.png
Image:Newawayjerseyholland.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

