Talk:Neo-Kantianism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Merge Discussion begun April 2007

[edit] Merge Discussion begun April 2007

Neo-Kantianism

Do not merge Neo-Kantianism with Kantianisam. it is always better to have more than one articles on the similar subject, since, for example, some people are interested only in Neo-Kantianism philosopy, and if they find it convenient they can always check out the Kantianism page. But if you are searching Neo-Kantianism only, you may expect to find it on special page, apart from other articles, and it may happen that you don't even remember to search Neo-Kantianism in the Kantianism page. To conclude Neo-Kantianism should not merge with Kantianism. Dusan Kovandzic

It is better not to merge it, Neo-Kantianism is an important philosophical school that should be treated on its own. Note that this article could use some revision and improvement. Ehmhel 01:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, absolutely not. Removing the notice. Lycurgus 07:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

This article on Neo-Kantianism is rather lacking. The majority of the article is on the people who were influential in developing this philosophy versus defining the philosophy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhowie86 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)