Talk:Ned Hanlon (baseball)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
 |
Ned Hanlon (baseball) is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of baseball and baseball-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cincinnati Reds, which aims to improve all articles related to the Cincinnati Reds. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within Cincinnati articles. | |
He is "C.F. Hanlon" in the photograph, but a different name in the article. Can someone explain the contradiction?
- "C. F." refers to Center Field, a fielding position at which Hanlon primarily played. It was not to denote the initials of one's name. Rothesay 15:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Federal League involvement
I edited the article slightly to include something I think is important in his involvement with baseball, that being his involvement in the failed Federal League. I didn't think an article this small needed footnotes/cites, but the article is here http://www.bioproj.sabr.org/bioproj.cfm?a=v&v=l&bid=923&pid=5784 if you think it's needed. As I said, though, it didn't seem necessary to include a footnote for this short of an article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DTF955 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
