Talk:Ned Block

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

	Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
Additional information: Related task forces (major fields): Philosophy of mind Philosophers Related task forces (periods): Contemporary philosophy

Contents 1 Loebner Prize 2 Qualia 3 BTA's 4 WikiProject class rating

[edit] Loebner Prize

What year was Ned Block has been a judge at the Loebner Prize contest?

[edit] Qualia

Shouldn't we add some information about his famous debate with Sydney Shoemaker about whether "Absent Qualia" are possible? Acumensch 00:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BTA's

I am not entirely sure what all of this means, but I am pretty sure it is nonsense, and maybe it is also a personal attack. It should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.82.152.49 (talk) 19:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)