Talk:Natural person

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Copied from article page, comment by 216.18.21.24

Actually, yes, a court has dealt with natural persons. Try doing some due dilligence morons. There IS duality of person in law. It's in the fucking law dictionary. People are too close-minded to accept it. There is also a thing called a Legal Maxim, which is an absolute truth in law. The legal maxim everyone should know about is called "Capitis Diminutio". It is the loss of status through capitalization.

The definition of "capitalize" is - to use to ones' own advantage. So if you did not capitalize on your name for example, then someone else did. It is an artificial person. Lacking the rights of a citizen(Life, libery, security of the person, enjoyment of property not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law). Ever seen your name spelled like this - John DOE or JOHN DOE(Look at your drivers' license). Artificial persons are dealt with in artificial court. It is called an administrative tribunal, and is not listed in the court system. When they call the artificial persons name in artificial court, and you accept that it is you(tacit accpetance), you have just given up your rights as a citizen.

[edit] They may be morons

When deciding to tell people that they are morons, please let them know here or on their userpage instead of on an article page.

Also, Lucy-marie, if you go to the person talk page, where I know you've ben quite active, you'll find a complete definition for person (pl), from the OED, when it tells you in which cases which plural is correct. Both "people" and "persons" are plural forms of "person", and they are used at different times. I'm a grammar stickler as much as everyone else, but stickle correctly please. TStein 10:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)