Talk:Natural hazard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
[edit] Merge - 'Natural disaster' be merged into Natural hazard
May I suggest that the page 'Natural disaster' be merged into Natural hazard? Rather than the other way round?
It's a simple case of cause and effect: A natural hazard is the cause of a natural disaster. Further to this argument, on the page 'Natural Disaster' the information on natural hazards was the main constituent.
There's alot more that can be added on 'natural disaster' such as definitions etc (see discussion on 'natural disaster' page.), but unfortunately I have to work now! --Ragdoll1984 07:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] No mention of responses to natural hazards
No mention of this, I note Geoscience Australia has just released a report[1] on this, I would be surprised if the US did not have something similar. Paul foord (talk) 12:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
