Talk:National Cathedral School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by the District of Columbia WikiProject.

This project provides a central approach to District of Columbia-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
WikiProject Anglicanism
National Cathedral School is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as b-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


WikiProject Schools This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet been assessed. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary. [FAQ]
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within Schools. Please rate the article.

[edit] Copyright

Some of the material on this page appears to violate the copyright of [1] Kappa 18:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV

I'm going to flag this page for a neutrality check. It appears to be new (the photo posted is from May 2005) and much of the material sounds like it came right out of promotional literature for the school. As an alumna, I can attest to the fact that many of the statements made here gloss over problems and emphasize virtues that are not at all prevalent. Moreover, it uses words and phrases to describe parts of the school that no one except the school administration actually uses and/or believes to be accurate. The section on the school philosophy especially nags at me. I could almost swear I've seen these exact words in brochures at the Development Office. --Illix, 13 February 2006

Please try to neutralize if it you can, I will do the same. Awiseman 18:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
I have modified some obviously non-factual statements and removed others. The original text in the school philosophy section was indeed loosely adapted from the school's mission statement. I have instead labeled it as the school's mission statement and quoted it in its entirety. I believe the article is now neutral and informative and have removed the neutrality flag. --llemma, 23 July 2006. (Sorry, I don't have a username yet, but I'll keep tabs on this page.)
For some reason, the neutrality flag remains, long after this discussion seems to have resolved the problems described. I'm taking it off again. Tmangray 05:54, 28 October 2007 (UTC)