User talk:Nasbr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Your edits regaurding Talk:SOCIAL LIFE

Hello. I've noticed you started the SOCIAL LIFE article on it's talk page, then moved it to the article namespace. This is not the recommended way to create articles. (For one thing they can be deleted without notice per WP:CSD G8) Talk pages shouldn't be used as sandboxes, however, you are more than welcome to create a sandbox or sandboxes within you own user sub-pages. (For example User:Nasbr/Sandbox). I know there's a lot of rules here, and we don't expect everyone to know them all, so it's not really a problem, just something to avoid in the future. By the way, welcome to Wikipedia! Rocket000 02:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

One more thing, please keep in mind this is a EnglishWikipedia, and links like this are not recommended as most editors can not verify the information because it's in a foreign language. It also not very helpful to English-speaking readers that follow the link wishing to read more. Rocket000 02:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sociallife2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sociallife2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)