Talk:Nash Motors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Wisconsin. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
If you give this article a rating or change a previous rating, please leave a short summary in the comments to explain the rating and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of Wikipedia Project Automobiles, a collective approach to creating a comprehensive guide to the world of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you are encouraged to visit the project page, where you can contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of Companies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of companies. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating assessment scale.

Did they really have air in '38? I'd always heard Packard was first in '39. RivGuySC 19:21, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Significant overhaul

I added in a number of facts based on the work of Tad Burness and the Standard Catalogue of American Cars 1946-1975.

Also, I elimniated the statement that Nash was wasn't known for innovations - Nils Eric Wahlberg was one of the most innovative engineers in the Automotive field. To say that Nash wasn't innovative, or had few innovations simply isn't accurate. user: stude62 user talk:stude62 02:39, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)