Talk:Naruto Collectible Card Game

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.

This article should really be focused more around the history and key points of the game, not just another place for the card list. 24.178.73.84 21:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm gonna go ahead and remove the "Notable Players" list. All it is is clutter, and it's unencyclopedic. Treima 02:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Just put in the new infobox and the distribution section. I will put in a card image when I have the ability to do so (the computer I'm on now doesn't have a scanner). Treima 03:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Anyone think I should add an example of a Mission card, a Jutsu card and a Client card to the article? I think it would be helpful for people trying to understand the differences between them. I will go ahead and do that if it is okay with everyone. Treima 00:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Images

I suggest someone scans the front and back of a basic card, and to add an "Anatomy of a Naruto CCG Card" section. Also talk about the Supply/Demand issue with this card game. Timekeeper 01:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Good idea! I'll get the distribution thing up as soon as I can get some data and I'll get a card image when I get back on my computer at home. Treima 02:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gauging 'Strategy Depth'

I'm curious to how 'Strategy Depth' is gauged exactly. Though Naruto is listed as 'high' I wouldn't mark it as that. The tag says it was discussed within the Magic talk page, but throughout the pages and their archives I couldn't find any consensus. Indeed, I wouldn't even consider Magic as high strategy! Exactly how are we gauging here? Chronomaster 15:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


I think it might have something to do with the fact that you really have to be careful and conservative with your cards when playing this game. There is a lot of strategy in playing a deck that includes a lot of the same element so that you can charge chakras but still also be able to play cards to fight with. Even though a 40 card deck seems big, it really isn't and it takes some thinking to put a good one together that can allow you to charge a lot of chakra and fight. Plus, if you have a lot of powerfull cards, you also have to think of entrance costs for them. It dose take a good amount of thinkig to know how to play all these elements to your advantage.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Narutocardgame.JPG

Image:Narutocardgame.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

I have contributed another image, complete with the requested information. If there is a discrepancy, please contact me. Chronomaster (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unclear sentence

The sentence from the article (as follows) is an unclear fragment. I can not figure out what it is referring to: "Cannot be found in blisters or non-blisters." Please make this a complete sentence. Also, there are other syntax errors throughout the article (like missing spaces, misspelled words, etc). Please correct these. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathman1550 (talk • contribs) 22:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)