Talk:Naked DSL

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We need some comments on who offers it, and why everyone doesn't. I don't know enough about the regulations/options to do it myself :( But if I manage to find out, I'll be back.

I assume most don't offer it because of the possibility to cut into their profits. Dry loop is a good way to go VoIP, and no Telco want Vonage infringing on their turf. Just my guess, of course. :) True Vox 06:23, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

I dont think LLU is the same as naked DSL

Information about naked DSL of quality of service would be germane. LorenzoB 21:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ILEC versus RBOC

I've changed the reference to RBOC to ILEC instead. For the context in which it was used, ILEC seems more appropriate since it is immediately apparent as being the opposite of CLEC. Also, RBOC is a term that is specific to the United States, while ILEC is (at least slightly) more universal. --Miken2005 07:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

---

out of date links

the page linked to is no longer avalible.Pikajedi3 13:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] USA - AT&T's DSL Direct

Rather than try to update the USA section I will add that since the merger of AT&T and BellSouth back in January 2007, AT&T is offering a service called FastAccess DSL Direct not just in Texas if I have my sources right. A trip to the AT&T website has a link down near the bottom that leads to an 800 phone number. Greenbomb101 (talk) 20:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

I had service from Verizon's dry loop for around $23/month. This is to dispute the wiki article item noting that dry loop is not competitively priced and costs more than bundled services. (Despite the low price, I eventually dumped the product because of shoddy customer service.) Cdfield (talk) 14:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)