Talk:Mylanthanai massacre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Consensus This article is currently subject to editing restrictions, as laid out during a previous dispute resolution process. If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the guidelines laid out here. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it on this talk page first.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mylanthanai massacre article.

Article policies
Archives: 1
This is a controversial topic that may be under dispute. Please read this page and discuss substantial changes here before making them.
Make sure to supply full citations when adding information and consider tagging or removing uncited/unciteable information.
Discussions on this page may escalate into heated debate. Please try to keep a cool head when commenting here. See also: Wikipedia:Etiquette.

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation, a collaborative, bipartisan effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Sri Lankan Civil War. For guidelines and a participants list see the project page. You can discuss the project at its talk page.

Archive
Archives

[edit] is this table a substitute for the deleted template ??

Most of the incident in this table are disputed..some could be false too.see relevant talk pages for further details.thanks--Iwazaki 11:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I was thinking about adding all massacres in the eastern province if there is a citation for it. The list as it is now has citation for it from HRW but if you want to add Kokilai massacre and other massacres of Sinhalese and muslim civilians to the lsi to make it neutral then we need a citation for it. A question in your massacre series by LTTE you have lists, i wonder whether those had any citations or is it original research ? infact I am going to tag them as such, if you have a citation even a mrginal one that is acceptable to the Sri Lanka reconciliation project then we can remove the tags otherwise those articles have to re written. Thanks RaveenS
Tamilnet is reporting on what the eye witness have said. Taking this off is vandalism Watchdogb 12:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What is the dispute

The eye witness belives Sri lank soldiers did it, sri lanka government belives Sri lankan soldiers did it. The Jury lets them go although the Judge asks them to reconsider. The Relatives are upset and {[UTHR]] thinks that stinks, now any reasonable wikipedian will belive that the perptrator column has to atleast say disputed not done by unknown ghosts. Thanks Taprobanus 00:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)