Talk:MV Hyundai Fortune

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MV Hyundai Fortune article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Start	rated as start-Class on the assessment scale
Mid	rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, an attempt to improve coverage of shipwreck-related topics. See also the parent WikiProject, WikiProject Disaster Management. If you plan to work on this article for an extended period of time, please indicate what you are doing on the Project's talk page.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload.
???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project's importance scale.
Shipwreck-related priority open tasks: To Do Shipwrecks Clean up typos Improve grammar Add any additions if needed Discuss desired additions Cattewater Wreck Needs expansion Done Shipwrecks Re-wrote the first paragraph Cleaned up Types of Shipwrecks it felt a bit jumbled Cattewater Wreck Started the article

[edit] Causes?

Isn't speculation over the causes of the explosion, including allegations of unscrupulous dangerous-goods handling, out of place in a Wikipedia article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.239.157.155 (talk • contribs) 12:12, July 21, 2006

The calcium hypochlorite and fireworks theories seem valid. Indeed, the fireworks were the primary suspect during the follow-up investigation. However, I agree that the part about dangerous goods is a little out of line. I'll remove it. - Tronno ( t | c ) 20:24, 21 July 2006 (UTC)