Talk:Muttaburrasaurus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article, image or category is supported by WikiProject Dinosaurs, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more information.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.

Muttaburrasaurus is included in the 2007 Wikipedia for Schools, or is a candidate for inclusion in future versions. Please maintain high quality standards, and make an extra effort to include free images, because non-free images cannot be used on the CDs.

Portal	Muttaburrasaurus is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Muttaburrasaurus article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

[edit] earlier comments

Why is this image so dark? The duplicate image on Commons [1] is so much brighter. My only guess is that when the image was resized, it was also darkened considerably. On my monitor, this image is hardly viewable.--Firsfron of Ronchester 17:02, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Same here. If the darker version exists on Wiki and lighter on commons, both with the smae name, whoever uploaded it will have to re-upload the brighter version to wiki.Dinoguy2 01:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

I've sent a message to the original uploader. Hopefully, we'll get a response. He does appear to still be active (last message was a few days ago).--Firsfron of Ronchester 05:58, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Good work 'behind the scenes'. - Ballista 07:29, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

I have been trying to re-upload the image, and answer comments on the talk pages, without any success for the past couple of days. If this edit works, I will try re-uploading the image yet again. Figaro 07:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

The brighter image has now been successfully uploaded. Figaro 08:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Figaro! Much better.Dinoguy2 13:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Looks great! --Firsfron of Ronchester 15:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Smart! Thanks - Ballista 03:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New 'Popular culture' entry query

I wondered why the use of the word 'would', in this new entry in the 'Popular culture' section:

"A Muttaburrasaurus character would also be featured in the third "The Land Before Time" sequel."

I'm not 'up' in TV/film stuff, so don't know if this is referring to past viewing or possible future viewing. - Ballista 04:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Ummm........not sure. have to look on the tapes.....I have them somewhere.......Cas Liber 04:38, 18 September 2006 (UTC)