Talk:Musha shugyō

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Musha shugyō article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Martial arts Portal	This page is part of the Wikipedia Martial arts Project. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article if you think something is missing, please help us improve them! You may also wish to read the project's Notability guide.	Chinese Manual of Style - Naming conventions Japanese Manual of Style Korean Manual of Style - Naming conventions Biographies Manual of Style
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] Contested move request

The following request to move a page has been added to Wikipedia:Requested moves as an uncontroversial move, but this has been contested by one or more people. Any discussion on the issue should continue here. If a full request is not lodged within five days of this request being contested, the request will be removed from WP:RM. —Stemonitis 17:24, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• Musha shugyō → Musha shūgyō — Under Wikipedia romanization guidelines, the "u" in "shugyo" should have a macron indicating an elongated vowel. —219.209.107.16 06:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• 'shugyō' is correct. --Kusunose 06:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose move, correct romanization is musha shugyō (武者修行 : むしゃしゅぎょう, musha shugyō^?). Note also that this move was improperly listed - nominator failed to provide "move" tag and prepare location for discussion at the article. Bradford44 17:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• The rationale for the page move is false, as the "u" in "shugyō" is NOT elongated. Please note that Musha shugyō is the correct romanization already, and the suggested page move will result in an incorrect romanization.--Endroit 18:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)