Talk:Muse (Hong Kong Magazine)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I strongly oppose deleting this article. Even though Muse Magazine is quite new, it is getting more and more popular in Hong Kong. Can anyone tell me what should I do to prevent this article from being deleted?

• Normally you want 3rd party coverage, like links from other publications discussing the magazine. Local newspapers reviewing it, etc. Needs Reliable Sources indicating it is notable. Pharmboy (talk) 13:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
• I am adding more sources to it. do you think it's ok now?

As a side note, it is helpful if at least one reference discussing the mag is in english, since we are the english version, although that isn't a requirement per se. Pharmboy (talk) 13:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

finding one... hold on... Germanomaniac (talk) 14:02, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

• is it ok now? Germanomaniac (talk) 14:10, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

It isn't up to me, I am just an editor like you and tagged it. It is up to an admin, who will likely wait a while to give you ample opportunity to fix it since he can see the conversation here and see a good faith effort to comply with the "must assert notability" requirement. Pharmboy (talk) 14:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

the link you gave is broken. An admin rm the tag for other reasons ( I used wrong tag for this type of article) and suggested AFD. If you can fix the link that leads to a local review, I would guess it passes the test, at least in my eyes. Pharmboy (talk) 14:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

i've tried it but it links perfectly fine for me... Germanomaniac (talk) 14:23, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Might be because I fixed the links ;) Check the history and summaries. You added / after all the links. Pharmboy (talk) 15:22, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, now i understand why... i added a slash after each url... will make sure that i dont do it in future... anyway, thanks for fixing the links!!Germanomaniac (talk) 16:17, 23 December 2007 (UTC)