Talk:Murray v. Pearson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale. | |
[edit] Ruling
Currently this stub reads as though the court ruled that racial segregation was wrong. However a contributor at Talk:Thurgood Marshall#Murray didn't overturn Plessy argues that it upheld the "separate but equal" status, and found that the Law School was in breach of the "equal" bit - but since the court couldn't create separate laws schools it had to abolish the separate status to deliver equal provision.
Is anyone able to write this clearer? Timrollpickering 03:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
