Talk:Murdoc Niccals
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Present The only thing known about Murdoc presently is that he is evil and is looking for souls with which to presumably be more evil. Russel, aware of this, is currently preparing an army of "Animal Kwackers" to stop his expanding evil.
Is this completely neccesary? If it isn't, delete it. If it is then perhaps some mention should be made about the hell hole and the events that took place on the Gorillaz web site on June sixth.
could we get a more recent picture from phase 2?
Why is there no mention of the Hell Hole in this article? 68.159.162.35 03:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Change
Should we change this to Murdoc Nicalls instead of Murdoc (Gorillaz)?
I myself agree with that. Captainstoat 19:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wrong Information
Someone keeps adding this:
Murdoc provided the vocals on the Demon Days track White Light; he sang it into a dictaphone one morning while intoxicated.
I keep taking it out, because it's not true, but someone keeps putting it back up.
~The Swagga
NO. I heard that too. like in a magazine.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Murdoc-largeside3.jpg
Image:Murdoc-largeside3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
I vote we change this page from "Murdoc (Gorillaz)" to "Murdoc Niccals". Thoughts? Opinions? Hate mail? I didn't do it. 00:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has been renamed from Murdoc (Gorillaz) to Murdoc Niccals as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 09:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Antichrist
I always thought Murdoc was an Antichrist or a Satanist for he always wore an upside down cross around his neck. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.138.131 (talk) 06:24, 3 September 2007 (UTC) He is a Satanist. Is that not in the article? Zazaban 16:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Murdoc-largeside3.jpg
Image:Murdoc-largeside3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
