Mulay

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For the homonymous Master of the Knights Templar, see Jacques de Molay
For the Moroccan title, see Prince

Mulay, Mûlay, Bulay, or Molay for the Franks,[1] was a general under the Mongol Ilkhanate ruler Ghazan at the end the 13th century. Mulay was part of the 1299-1300 Mongol offensive in Syria and Palestine, and remained with a small force to occupy the land after the departure of Ghazan. He also participated in the last Mongol offensive in the Levant in 1303. His name has caused confusion for some historians, because of its similarity with that of the contemporary Grand Master of the Knights Templar, Jacques de Molay.

Contents

[edit] 1299-1300 campaign

Victory of the Mongols (left) over the Mamluks (right) at the 1299 Battle of Homs
Victory of the Mongols (left) over the Mamluks (right) at the 1299 Battle of Homs
See also: Mongol raids into Palestine

In 1299, the Mongol Ilkhanate ruler Ghazan marched with his generals Mulay and Samagar towards Egyptian Mamluk-controlled Syria. The Mongols successfully took the city of Aleppo, and then defeated the Mamluks in the Battle of Wadi al-Khazandar, on December 23 or 24, 1299.[2]

At some point, Ghazan ordered Mulay to lead a raid through Palestine, with a tumen, a force of 10,000-20,000 horsemen.[3] Mulay's group split off from Ghazan's army,[4] and pursued the retreating Mamluk troops as far as Gaza, pushing them back to Egypt.[2]

The bulk of Ghazan's forces then proceeded on to Damascus, which surrendered at some point between December 30, 1299, and January 6, 1300, though its Citadel resisted.[5] Ghazan then retreated with most of his forces in February, probably because the Mongol horses needed fodder. He promised to return in November to attack Egypt.[6]

Meanwhile, Mulay and his horsemen engaged in raids as far south as Jerusalem and Gaza,[7][6] then returned to Damascus around March 1300,[8] and followed Ghazan back across the Euphrates. The Mamluks returned and reclaimed the entire area in May 1300,[9] without a battle.[10]

[edit] 1303 offensive

 This section may contain inappropriate or misinterpreted citations that do not verify the text.
Please help improve this article by checking for inaccuracies. (March 2008) (help, talk, get involved!)

In 1303, the Mongols, led by Ghazan's generals Mulay and Kutlushah, reappeared in great strength in Syria (about 80,000) together with the Armenians.[11] However, they were defeated at Homs on March 30, 1303, and also at the decisive Battle of Shaqhab, south of Damascus, on April 21, 1303.[11] It is considered to be the last major Mongol invasion of Syria.[12]

[edit] Mulay/Molay controversy

"Jacques Molay takes Jerusalem, 1299", a painting created in the 1800s by Claude Jacquand, and hanging in the "Hall of Crusades" in Versailles. In reality, though the Mongols may have been technically in control of the city for a few months in early 1300 (since no other troops were in the area), De Molay was almost certainly on the island of Cyprus at that time, nowhere near the landlocked city of Jerusalem.
"Jacques Molay takes Jerusalem, 1299", a painting created in the 1800s by Claude Jacquand, and hanging in the "Hall of Crusades" in Versailles. In reality, though the Mongols may have been technically in control of the city for a few months in early 1300 (since no other troops were in the area), De Molay was almost certainly on the island of Cyprus at that time, nowhere near the landlocked city of Jerusalem.

The 13th century historian Templar of Tyre (assistant to the Knights Templar on Cyprus), wrote of the 1300 offensive:

"Ghazan, when he had vanquished the Sarazins returned in his country, and left in Damas one of his Emirs, who was named Molay, who had with him 10,000 Tatars and 4 generals."

—Le Templier de Tyr 611[13]

The Molay mentioned by the Templar of Tyre has sometimes been confused with the contemporary Grand Master of the Knights Templar Jacques de Molay (also in the Levant at the time), but modern historians agree that it instead designates the Mongol general "Mûlay".[14]

This confusion, however, lasted several centuries, and even expanded in the 19th century to claims that Jerusalem had been captured by the Mongols, with Jacques de Molay in charge of one of the Mongol divisions.[14] In 1805, the French historian/playwright Raynouard said, "In 1299, the Grand-Master was with his knights at the taking of Jerusalem."[15] In the 1861 edition of the French encyclopedia, the Nouvelle Biographie Universelle, it says in the "Molay" article:

"Jacques de Molay was not inactive in this decision of the Great Khan. This is proven by the fact that Molay was in command of one of the wings of the Mongol army. With the troops under his control, he invaded Syria, participated in the first battle in which the Sultan was vanquished, pursued the routed Malik Nasir as far as the desert of Egypt: then, under the guidance of Kutluk, a Mongol general, he was able to take Jerusalem, among other cities, over the Muslims, and the Mongols entered to celebrate Easter"

—Nouvelle Biographie Universelle, "Molay" article, 1861.[14]

There is even a painting, Molay Prend Jerusalem, 1299 ("Molay Takes Jerusalem, 1299"), hanging in the French national museum in Versailles, created in 1846 by Claude Jacquand,[16] which depicts the supposed event in 1299.

Some modern writers, such as the contrarian historian Laurent Dailliez (Les Templiers) and the novelist of popular pseudohistory Robert Payne (The Dream and the Tomb), as well as various Templar-related websites, still consider that the Templar of Tyre's Molay was Jacques de Molay himself, and attribute all of Mulay's deeds, as well as rumors of his deeds, to the Grand Master.

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ "611. Ghazan, when he had vanquished the Sarazins returned in his country, and left in Damas one of his Emirs, who was named Molay, who had with him 10,000 Tatars and 4 generals." Le Templier de Tyr 611. Original French: 611. Cacan quant il eut desconfit les Sarazins se retorna en son pais et laissa a Domas .i. sien amiraill en son leuc quy ot a nom Molay qui ot o luy .xm. Tatars et .iiii. amiraus."
  2. ^ a b Demurger, p.97-99
  3. ^ Amitai, p. 244
  4. ^ Luisetto, p.205
  5. ^ Runciman, p.439
  6. ^ a b Demurger, p. 99 (English edition): "Ghazan left Syria under the control of the emir Mulay, whom the Templar of Tyre refers to as Molay, thereby leading to confusion with [Jacques de Molay]"
  7. ^ "Meanwhile the Mongol and Armenian troops raided the country as far south as Gaza." Schein, 1979, p. 810
  8. ^ Amitai, p. 247
  9. ^ Schein, 1979, p. 810
  10. ^ Amitai, p. 248
  11. ^ a b Demurger, p. 158
  12. ^ Nicolle, p. 80
  13. ^ Original French: 611. Cacan quant il eut desconfit les Sarazins se retorna en son pais et laissa a Domas .i. sien amiraill en son leuc quy ot a nom Molay qui ot o luy .xm. Tatars et .iiii. amiraus."
  14. ^ a b c Demurger, pp. 203-204
  15. ^ "Le grand-maître s'etait trouvé avec ses chevaliers en 1299 à la reprise de Jerusalem." François Raynouard (1805). Précis sur les Templiers.
  16. ^ Claudius Jacquand (1846). Jacques Molay Prend Jerusalem.1299 (painting). Hall of Crusades, Versailles. Retrieved on 2007-09-09.

[edit] References

[edit] Recommended reading

  • Jackson, Peter (2005). The Mongols and the West: 1221-1410. Longman. ISBN 978-0582368965. 
  • Richard, Jean (1996). Histoire des Croisades. Fayard. ISBN 2-213-59787-1. 
  • Stewart, Angus Donal. The Armenian Kingdom and the Mamluks: War and Diplomacy During the Reigns of Het'Um II (1289-1307). BRILL. ISBN 9004122923. 
  • Tyerman, Christopher (2006). God's War: A New History of the Crusades. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674023870. 
  • Weatherford, Jack (2004). Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 0-609-80964-4. 
Languages