User:Mtiffany71

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a Wikipedia user page.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mtiffany71.

Wikipedia:Babel

en	This user is a native speaker of English.

zh-1	該用戶能以基本的中文進行交流。该用户能以基本的中文进行交流。

fr-3

Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau avancé de français.

Search user languages

excl

This editor is an exclusionist.

This user is more than happy to retain their "personality disorder(s)" and delights in telling their mental health professional to screw off.

This user is of multiple ancestries.

js	This user can program in JavaScript.

Java

This user can program in Java.

.css

This user can write Cascading Style Sheets.

This user is a proud Pastafarian.
May his noodly appendage touch you.

xml

This user can write XML.

<html>

This user can write HTML.

This user's flame burns phenomenally bright, as this user is an avowed homosexual.

This user does not believe in romantic love.

This user enjoys gay porn..

.. a lot!

This user doesn't believe in myths or superstitions

atheos

This user is an atheist.

atheos

Please keep your imaginary friends to yourself. Thank you.

This user supports public transit.

This user urges others to make peace, not war, with drugs.

This user supports the use of nuclear power.

This user is a member of Wikipedians against censorship.

This user is opposed to online censorship.

This user believes in the separation of church and state.

This user sees nothing wrong with the human form and doesn't view it as something that needs to be hidden.

This user is skeptical of MBTI, regarding it as pseudoscience.

Militant Atheist

This user is proud to be a
Militant Atheist.

?!	Back It Up Or Pack It Up! Cite Your Sources!

Things which make me peevish:

Use of the word 'currently.' Don't use the word unless you plan on going back to the page in which the word is found and removing it once whatever was referenced as being 'current' no longer is. ' ¿Dŏng bù dŏng?
Superlatives. Most, least, best, worst, etc are generally good indicators that someone has an ax to grind about something. (Usually some earthy crunchy hippie who thinks that all technology is bad — except for their iPod — and that eating meat is cruel and evil — and yet still somehow manage to walk around in leather shoes.)
Confusing 'objectivity' and 'facts.' You have to be objective when you don't have any facts. If you have facts, you don't need to be objective. Two plus two always equals four. By definition. You don't need to be objective about that fact. You don't need to entertain the opinions of others that two plus two equals five, or three, or something other than four.
Unsourced statements and blatant assertions: back it up or pack it up.