User talk:Mrslippery

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Vandalism

Hello. Are you sure I deleted large sections of your article? I was completely unaware of doing so & I remain a little puzzled at the statement. Regardless, what was wrong with the new photographs & information? Rosser 22:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi Rosser. Perhaps you may have deleted by accident, or perhaps there may have been some software error. Too much was lost to do a cut and paste from an older version so I reverted the article. As far as I know I did not delete anything of yours deliberately, though something may have been lost in the reversion. If so, my apologies. Just put it back in. btw its not my article. I just have it on my watchlist. regards Mrslippery 18:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ossian's hall of Mirrors

I thought over your comment and I hope this compromise will suffice. Cheers . Rosser (talk) 21:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wheel charts

Per Wikipedia:Content forking#Accidental_duplicate_articles, we should never split one topic like that, between volvelle and another place, so I moved the page back. Please do not consider this a disregard for your edits, but they should be made on the main article, currently volvelle, not forked like that. If you would like to move the page to a new title, please see WP:MOVE and Wikipedia:Naming conventions. Thank you. • Anakin (talk) 16:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello again. Just letting you know, another editor has rearranged things slightly; there's now two articles: volvelle and slide chart. • Anakin (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

That is curious Anakin 101. Immediately after I reverted an edit of yours to the calculator article you went to an article [wheel chart] which I had just created and deleted it. That is either a strange coincidence, or a disgraceful example of retaliatory behaviour that has no place on Wikipedia.

Mrslippery (talk) 18:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I didn't delete it, I came to let you know exactly what had happened so that you could find it and put it into the article. It's basically there now. I'm not a retaliatory sort of person and it wasn't my intention to come into conflict with you twice in a day. I'm sorry about that. If you must know, I clicked your contributions to see if you had replied to the discussion at Talk:Calculator again, and saw it there. Again, I'm not a retaliatory person. I'm sorry if it seemed to you like I was picking on you, and I wasn't. Please do not hold it against me. • Anakin (talk) 18:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Further reply to this comment

In retrospect Mrslippery you were right to be annoyed. Perhaps I did not act wisely in reverting first and asking later, but I panicked when I saw that lots of redirects were changing. Again I apologize if you thought I was intentionally interfering as some sort of attack against you. With regards to Talk:Calculator, I am actually glad this discussion has started – it's about time that poor old article got a bit of attention. • Anakin (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)