Talk:Mount Ida (Turkey)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mount Ida (Turkey) article.

Article policies
WikiProject Mountains
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale for WikiProject Mountains.
If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments.
WikiProject Turkey This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Turkey, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Turkey-related topics. Please visit the the participants page if you would like to get involved. Happy editing!
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
edit · history · watch · refresh To-do list for Mount Ida (Turkey):

No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category

[edit] Comments

[edit] Desiderata

Geography: Location, dimensions, map, ethnography, economy, geologic history, streams, more flora and fauna, access including any famous paths.

Cult significance: this aspect surely goes back to prehistory. Cult centers, objects.

History: prehistory, Hittite records, people of Trojan War times and after, the Phrygians, etc., post-classical ethna, the arrival of the Turks.Dave 10:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Mythology: citations needed on all the characters from mythology. The mention of the story should be as brief as possible with links to its article; otherwise, we are in for a very large article.Dave 10:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Luqqa

"*In the Trojan war it may have been the home of the Luqqa, who were allies of the Trojans."

I removed this statement for now. The author probably means Lukka but no source is given. That is not a classical spelling.Dave 08:48, 25 March 2007 (UTC)