Mound system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please improve this article if you can. (December 2007)

This article or section needs to be wikified to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please help improve this article with relevant internal links. (December 2007)

Contents 1 General description 2 History 3 Design according to Ohio standards 4 References

[edit] General description

The mound system is one of many that have been developed as an alternative to the septic system. The mound system was developed to operate in areas where septic systems are more prone to failure. Specifically, areas that have slow or fast permeable soils, soil with shallow cover over porous bedrock, and soils that have high seasonal water table ⁽¹⁾.

[edit] History

The mound system was originally designed in the 1940's by the North Dakota College of Agriculture ⁽¹⁾. It was known as the Nodak Disposal System. In 1976 the University of Wisconsin studied the mound systems under the university's Waste Management Project. This project published the first design manual indicating the appropriate site conditions and design criteria for mounds. In 2000 a new manual was released ⁽¹⁾.

[edit] Design according to Ohio standards

The mound system includes a septic tank, a dosing chamber, and a mound. Waste from homes is sent to the septic tank where the solid fraction settles to the bottom of the tank. The effluent is sent to a second tank called a dosing chamber. In the dosing chamber, the effluent is evenly distributed in doses into the mound. Wastewater is partially treated as it moves through the mound sand. Final treatment and disposal occurs in the soil underneath the mound. The mound system can also better handle the effluent because it doesn't all come into the mound at once allowing the effluent to be better cleaned and helping to keep the mound system from failing.

The absorption mound is built in layers at different depths. The depths of these layers are determined by the depth of the limiting layer of the soil. A limiting layer in soil may be the depth to seasonal water table, depth to bedrock, depth to a fragipan, or depth to glacial till. Each county in Ohio and other states can change the criteria for mounds as they see fit. These are recommended standards that were published by the Ohio State University ⁽⁸⁾. These standards state that 24 inches of natural soil should be above the limiting layer in the soil. A layer of specifically sized sand is placed on top of the natural soil. The natural soil and the sand should equal a depth of 4 feet according to Ohio's standards. The distribution pipes that are fed by the dosing chamber are placed on top of the sand in layers of gravel. Then construction fabric and soil are placed on top of the gravel to help keep the pipes from freezing. The top layer of soil also allows the mound to be planted with grass or non-woody plants in order to control erosion ⁽⁷⁾.

When installing a mound system, the soil in the area where the mound will be placed should not be compacted or disturbed. Any trees that are on the area should be cut away at ground level. The roots and stumps should not be removed. The surface of the area for the mound should then be roughened up with a chisel plow. This prepares the area for the sand. Work should always be done from upslope of the mound area so that the ground down slope of the mound does not get compacted. All mounds are not the same size. Tyler tables are used to help determine the area of a mound ⁽¹¹⁾.

Time dosing is an important aspect in the functioning of the mound system. According to research done by Darby ⁽¹⁰⁾ on sand filters showed that short frequent doses of effluent onto sand filters with orifices that are closely spaced helps to improve effluent quality. This is where time dosing comes into play. Mounds used to be demand dosed and with demand dosed large amounts of effluent are released at once and this passes through the sand very rapidly. This does not give the biota the proper amount of time to clean the effluent ⁽¹⁾.

[edit] References

1 Converse, J.C., and J.E. Tyler. 2000. "WISCONSIN MOUND SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM:." Accessed on 10 Oct. 2007. Link.

2 Solomon, C., P. Casey, C. Mackne, and A. Lake. 1998. Mound Systems. National Small Flows Clearinghouse. 1-2. 10 Oct. 2007. Link.

3 National Small Flows Clearinghouse, 1999. MOUNDS: a SEPTIC SYSTEM ALTERNATIVE. Pipeline 10(3): 1-8. Accessed on Oct. 2007. Link.

4 SepticAPedia. 2007. Using Septic Mounds as Components of Alternative Septic Systems for Difficult Sites. Building & Environmental Inspection, Testing, Diagnosis, Repair, & Problem Prevention Advice. 09/05/2007. 15 Oct 2007. Link

5 The Water Quality Program Committee. Virginia Tech. 1996. "Maintenance of Mound Septic Systems." Virginia Tech. Virginia Cooperative Extension. Accessed on 15 Oct 2007. Link.

6 Mancl, Karen. 1993. Septic Tank - Mound System. Ohio State University Extension. Ohio State University. Accessed on 15 Oct 2007. Link.

7 Mancl, K. 2001. Managing Septic Tank-Mound Systems. Ohio State University Extension Fact Sheet. Ohio State University. Accessed on 15 Oct 2007 Link.

8 Hamilton County General Health District. 2005. Household Sewage Treatment System. Hamilton County. Accessed on Oct 15, 2007. Link.

9 Darby, J, G. Tchobanoglous, M. Arsi Nor, and D. Maciolek. 1996. Shallow intermittent sand filtration: performance evaluation. The Small Flows Journal. 2:3-16.

10 Ohio Department of Health. 2007. Sand Mounds with Pressure Distribution. Special Device Approval per OAC 3701-29-20(C).Ohio Department of Health. Accessed on Dec 3, 2007 Link.