Talk:Motivational speaker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Lacks sources
This article lacks sources, and contains phrases such as "It is fairly agreed", "Another concern raised is..." and "Experts debate the long-term value of...". It also, to my mind, seems to be too favourable in tone, lacking any substantive objective critisism (which I am sure exists) of the industry. Ailahusky 23:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC)ailahusky
[edit] Agree
I was going to the discussion page to exactly highlight the lack of sources and the richness of random assumptions in the article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.87.98.224 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 23 May 2007
Why is so much attention devoted to bashing religious motivational speeches?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.70.16.43 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 17 August 2007
- Me, too. Wikipedia is not a how-to guide, nor an editorial. This article has some very significant problems. 71.174.226.117 20:34, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- I think I did a decent job of editing out the bias. Anyone like to take a second look? Tserton 02:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
